Home > Journals > JOEUC > Article
The Impact of In-Feed Recommendation on Consumers' Impulse Buying Behavior on Short Video Platforms
Open Access Journal

The Impact of In-Feed Recommendation on Consumers' Impulse Buying Behavior on Short Video Platforms

Hanmeng Xia (Southeast University, China), Huiru Yang (College of fine Arts, Anqing Normal University, China), Xiaoqian Liu (School of Economics and Management, Chengdu Technological University, China), and Xin Zhang (Graduate School of Business Administration, Wonkwang University, South Korea)
Copyright: © 2025 | Pages: 30
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.385730

Abstract

The widespread adoption of algorithm-driven short video platforms has transformed how users process content and engage in impulsive purchasing. However, current models often fail to capture the multi-dimensional psychological mechanisms that underlie such behavior, particularly the dynamic interplay between content signals, emotional immersion, perceptual intuition, and algorithmic perception. To address these limitations, this study proposes stimulus-organism-response–elaboration likelihood model, an integrated behavioral model that fuses the stimulus–organism–response paradigm with dual-route elaboration (central and peripheral), flow experience, and algorithmic trust. The model differentiates between cognitive and behavioral impulsivity, incorporates post-purchase regret as a feedback mechanism, and models personalization and transparency as precursors to algorithmic attitude and trust.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

With the rapid evolution of algorithm-driven digital platforms (Li, 2024), short video applications such as TikTok and Kuaishou have reshaped the way users consume information and make purchase decisions (Liu & Khong-khai, 2024; Xing et al., 2025). Information flow recommendation—powered by real-time user profiling and content delivery algorithms—has transformed passive content browsing into an immersive, personalized shopping experience (Koç, 2023; Zhang et al., 2025). In this context, impulse buying behavior has become increasingly prevalent and strategically significant (Gao et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023; Ma et al., 2024), prompting both academic and industrial interest in understanding its psychological and technological underpinnings (Kaur & Sharma, 2024). This study aims to investigate how algorithmic recommendations on short video platforms influence consumers' impulsive decision making, offering a novel and comprehensive framework for capturing these dynamics.

Prior studies have approached impulsive buying from various perspectives, including affective engagement (Bai & Bai, 2024; Gong & Jiang, 2023), content characteristics (Shao, 2024), and user motivation (Febrilia et al., 2024). The stimulus–organism–response (SOR) model has been widely adopted to explain media-driven behavioral reactions (Li & Guenier, 2024; Xia et al., 2024), while the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) has provided valuable insights into the dual-route nature of information processing (Yu et al., 2025). More recently, emerging works have begun incorporating algorithmic factors such as perceived personalization and transparency (Mingyang Li et al., 2022; Ram et al., 2024), acknowledging that user responses are increasingly shaped by system-level signals (Braganza, 2025; Dianxia & Yin, 2024). However, three key limitations remain:

  • The interaction between cognitive elaboration and emotional immersion is often oversimplified.

  • Algorithmic trust is rarely modeled as an integrated and dynamic influence.

  • Post-decision outcomes, such as purchase regret, are frequently overlooked.

Addressing these gaps presents several challenges. First, impulsive behavior in algorithmic contexts is not merely a function of emotional arousal but a consequence of complex, real-time information processing. Second, algorithmic cues often serve dual roles—as both enablers of trust and triggers of skepticism—which require fine-grained modeling. Third, impulse behavior is inherently multi-dimensional, involving cognitive intention, behavioral execution, and post-action evaluation, yet few models explicitly disentangle these stages. These challenges call for a framework that can integrate psychological, content-based, and algorithmic perspectives in a cohesive and testable structure.

To tackle these challenges, we propose a new model—SOR-ELM, which builds on the SOR paradigm by incorporating dual-route elaboration from ELM, emotional flow experience, and algorithmic perception. The core premise of our method is that short video-induced impulsivity emerges from the interaction of three dimensions: content signal strength (credibility, diagnosticity); user processing mechanisms (central and peripheral elaboration, flow) and algorithmic perception (personalization, transparency, trust). Moreover, the model uniquely incorporates post-purchase regret as a behavioral feedback loop, completing the decision–response–evaluation cycle.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 38: 1 Issue (2026)
Volume 37: 1 Issue (2025)
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing